w00t! Accusation #1 for 2006
Well…. as I said in my last post: Of course no matter what happens I’ll be accused of having a thing for someone or other. The winner (in terms of the accuser) was Greg, who was one of the favorites in terms of the accusing.
As for the accusee…. well…. I discounted the accusation purely by arguing against the reason. Although I had given out the idea in previous discussions that looking at positioning in the Conference group photos is a good way to determine someones interests… it definately was a good indicator for at least half of the previous conferences I’ve been in group shots for. Mainly because I like to leave these kinds of clues for people. Although studying other people in group shots has proven to be fruitful for predetermining many relationships that have formed in SL.
But it all falls down when it comes to this time, because I didn’t choose my place for this group shot. I was placed by Ian so that he could determine the boundaries of the shot (with The Smith being the other boundary).
Plus I historically only go for white girls….
Gah… so you leave clues for all the times I DIDN’T take notice of such things, and when I do, fail to leave such clues? Sheesh!
~Greg/Accuser/Winner out.
You’re right – If I hadn’t been posted in my position, I probably would have siddled up to the one I’m interested in, who at this point will remain a hypothetical construct to cover my tracks.
It’s ‘sidled’, I’m pretty sure. You can’t “siddle” up to anything.
:-P